<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of SearchPart Eight: We Really Can Get To Better Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.searchme.com/2008/05/the-future-of-searchpart-eight-we-really-can-get-to-better-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.searchme.com/2008/05/the-future-of-searchpart-eight-we-really-can-get-to-better-search/</link>
	<description>You'll know it when you see it.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: syboule</title>
		<link>http://blog.searchme.com/2008/05/the-future-of-searchpart-eight-we-really-can-get-to-better-search/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>syboule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.searchme.com/?p=41#comment-91</guid>
		<description>superbe moteur de recherche ... 
bravo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>superbe moteur de recherche &#8230;<br />
bravo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arow</title>
		<link>http://blog.searchme.com/2008/05/the-future-of-searchpart-eight-we-really-can-get-to-better-search/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Arow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.searchme.com/?p=41#comment-86</guid>
		<description>WOW! "Categories" - I'm liking it! Probably the best search result I've ever had when looking for places to eat in Chicago - there are so many that it really does require digital assistance to pick one at times. Now I have a digital tool that can *actually* help! There are so many restaurants in Chicago that different search sites are really necessary - One for fine dining - one for happy hours - I found both of these in the Restaurant Category just searching 'Chicago.' 

I think you can go one better, though. How about offering a 'miscategorized page' link or button on 'category' results to help tweak the algos - ain't nothin better than pure user data, right?

Thanks for pointing the 'categories' function out - I could've overlooked it if you hadn't.

It's very well considered that results keep appearing as I keep browsing, too! It's nice to not have to load a page just for more results. Great work here!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! &#8220;Categories&#8221; - I&#8217;m liking it! Probably the best search result I&#8217;ve ever had when looking for places to eat in Chicago - there are so many that it really does require digital assistance to pick one at times. Now I have a digital tool that can *actually* help! There are so many restaurants in Chicago that different search sites are really necessary - One for fine dining - one for happy hours - I found both of these in the Restaurant Category just searching &#8216;Chicago.&#8217; </p>
<p>I think you can go one better, though. How about offering a &#8216;miscategorized page&#8217; link or button on &#8216;category&#8217; results to help tweak the algos - ain&#8217;t nothin better than pure user data, right?</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing the &#8216;categories&#8217; function out - I could&#8217;ve overlooked it if you hadn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very well considered that results keep appearing as I keep browsing, too! It&#8217;s nice to not have to load a page just for more results. Great work here!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
